Wednesday, November 11, 2009

Rolling Stone gives Phrazes a mediocre review

it figures. they have such trite music critics. not that I'd trust a publication that put Megan Fox on the cover one issue ago, and devotes 1/3 of its current cover to Bono (how many times has he made the cover this year alone? talentless hack.)

they didn't like Ludlow St, but if I remember properly, they gave Costello's piece of crap album a good review

don't even get me started on their despicable reverence for those Jonas drones and the fact that they couldn't appreciate Led Zeppelin in their own time.

5 comments:

Katie said...

Dumb fucks

Hanan said...

hahahahhahahahhahahahah

brevity is the soul of wit.

SP said...

Am I the only one that's bothered by the fact that Bob Dylan who has the most annoying voice on the face of the planet, but wrote a song "Like a ROLLING STONE" is in the magazine's top 10 (it may be top 5, i forget) greatest singers of all time. OR that "Like a ROLLING STONE" is the magazine's #1 greatest song of all time (Bullshit) OR that the ROLLING STONES picked up the #3 spot spot on that same list with "Satisfaction"?!?! Maybe I'm being hypersensitive. Rolling Stone wouldn't do something like that, right?

Hanan said...

haha you know I had a very similar theory a few years back but hadn't thought about it again until now. stupid RS.

Anonymous said...

divides fish yahoo empress auro teams fission iceland trips issued partnersthe
masimundus semikonecolori